Photo
ivyblossom:

ivyblossom:

STILL MY FAVOURITE

STILL IS
NEVER-ENDING FAVOURITE

ivyblossom:

ivyblossom:

STILL MY FAVOURITE

STILL IS

NEVER-ENDING FAVOURITE

(via mountlandme)

Photoset

deputychairman:

Who needs CGI when you have THIS?

BEST ALIEN OF ALL TIME.

(Source: someofuslaughsomeofuscry)

Photoset

This is one of my favorite moments in the entire series.

(via holmesosis)

Photoset

feriowind:

hellotailor:

HEIGHT CHART OF HOLLYWOOD LEADING MEN.

Tom Cruise is 5’7”???!? wow he seems taller than that, we’re like the same height….. 

Wow, only two of them are taller than me.

Tags: Mind=Blown
Photo
misternoodles:

autumninthenorth:

swedens:

I love this image so much.
I’ve seen some women who are offended by this and say it’s ridiculous that her cleavage is showing and things of that sort.
Personally, I think it’s great.
Why should we have an image of a women with her hair tied up and flexing her muscles like she’s a man? (not that that isn’t great too!) In a way it suggests that when our hair is down, our breasts are visible and we wear (GASP) lipstick, we’re somehow lesser than men? We can do it! We can be feminine and successful.
You see what I’m saying here, ladies?
You don’t have to lose your femininity. Being feminine is great. Being masculine is great. Strength is not limited to one way of being.

oh my fucking god, this again
okay
Have you even looked at the actual Rosie the Riveter poster lately?

She’s ALREADY WEARING LIPSTICK.  AND MASCARA.  AND BLUSH.  Her eyebrows have been PENCILED AND TWEEZED.  And underneath her work bandana?  HER HAIR HAS BEEN CURLED.  Rosie the Riveter is a beautiful woman.  This image in no way implies that wearing feminine apparel (like cosmetics) is a negative thing.
The reason that she has her hair up and her shirt buttoned and is flexing her arms has nothing to do with prudery, or with trying to be “masculine” (as if shows of physical strength are unique to one gender).  It has to do with the information at the bottom of the poster: Rosie is involved in war production.  That means doing hard physical labor in a 1940s factory, where large heavy machinery can easily snag a loose lock of hair, or a bit of jewelry, or an undone button.  “Makeover” Rosie would not be able to do the real Rosie’s job without serious risk of injury to herself or the people around her.  In that sense, the new poster is implying that no, women are NOT capable of doing the same work as men, because they are too weak/vain/self-absorbed/whatever.  The old poster is saying that, while still being feminine, women are just as capable of doing the same work as men.
Also?  The new and “improved” Rosie was specifically drawn to be ANTI-FEMINIST.  “[William Murai] created this image for the Brazilian Alfa Magazine to accompany an article about the End of Feminism. ‘The idea was to remake the famous feminism symbol “Rosie the Riveter” [into] a lady who is giving up on her duties and trying to look sexy again.’” (emphasis mine)
Giving up her duties and trying to look sexy?  For whom, exactly?  According to the artist (and the patriarchy), men.  In other words, quit your job, look hot, find a man, gb2 the kitchen, and make me a sandwich, bitch.  Also known as THE SAME TIRED-ASS SHIT WOMEN HEAR EVERY. FUCKING. DAY.
The new poster is not “progress.”  It is not about women being “feminine and successful.”  It’s about the exact opposite: women being reduced to their appearance and their sex appeal according to the standards imposed by the male gaze.  She is pretty, but that’s all she is, because that’s all women are supposed to be.  The real Rosie (you know, the feminist icon?) is beautiful, and feminine, and strong enough to do the work necessary to keep her country safe, just the same as any man.  Her worth is not in her appeal as a decorative object, but in the product of her labor and her own awareness of her abilities.
Rosie the Riveter.  Accept NO substitutes.

Now I know! :o Thanks tumblr for re-teaching me about the first picture above! 

misternoodles:

autumninthenorth:

swedens:

I love this image so much.

I’ve seen some women who are offended by this and say it’s ridiculous that her cleavage is showing and things of that sort.

Personally, I think it’s great.

Why should we have an image of a women with her hair tied up and flexing her muscles like she’s a man? (not that that isn’t great too!) In a way it suggests that when our hair is down, our breasts are visible and we wear (GASP) lipstick, we’re somehow lesser than men? We can do it! We can be feminine and successful.

You see what I’m saying here, ladies?

You don’t have to lose your femininity. Being feminine is great. Being masculine is great. Strength is not limited to one way of being.

oh my fucking god, this again

okay

Have you even looked at the actual Rosie the Riveter poster lately?

She’s ALREADY WEARING LIPSTICK.  AND MASCARA.  AND BLUSH.  Her eyebrows have been PENCILED AND TWEEZED.  And underneath her work bandana?  HER HAIR HAS BEEN CURLED.  Rosie the Riveter is a beautiful woman.  This image in no way implies that wearing feminine apparel (like cosmetics) is a negative thing.

The reason that she has her hair up and her shirt buttoned and is flexing her arms has nothing to do with prudery, or with trying to be “masculine” (as if shows of physical strength are unique to one gender).  It has to do with the information at the bottom of the poster: Rosie is involved in war production.  That means doing hard physical labor in a 1940s factory, where large heavy machinery can easily snag a loose lock of hair, or a bit of jewelry, or an undone button.  “Makeover” Rosie would not be able to do the real Rosie’s job without serious risk of injury to herself or the people around her.  In that sense, the new poster is implying that no, women are NOT capable of doing the same work as men, because they are too weak/vain/self-absorbed/whatever.  The old poster is saying that, while still being feminine, women are just as capable of doing the same work as men.

Also?  The new and “improved” Rosie was specifically drawn to be ANTI-FEMINIST.  “[William Murai] created this image for the Brazilian Alfa Magazine to accompany an article about the End of Feminism. ‘The idea was to remake the famous feminism symbol “Rosie the Riveter” [into] a lady who is giving up on her duties and trying to look sexy again.’” (emphasis mine)

Giving up her duties and trying to look sexy?  For whom, exactly?  According to the artist (and the patriarchy), men.  In other words, quit your job, look hot, find a man, gb2 the kitchen, and make me a sandwich, bitch.  Also known as THE SAME TIRED-ASS SHIT WOMEN HEAR EVERY. FUCKING. DAY.

The new poster is not “progress.”  It is not about women being “feminine and successful.”  It’s about the exact opposite: women being reduced to their appearance and their sex appeal according to the standards imposed by the male gaze.  She is pretty, but that’s all she is, because that’s all women are supposed to be.  The real Rosie (you know, the feminist icon?) is beautiful, and feminine, and strong enough to do the work necessary to keep her country safe, just the same as any man.  Her worth is not in her appeal as a decorative object, but in the product of her labor and her own awareness of her abilities.

Rosie the Riveter.  Accept NO substitutes.

Now I know! :o Thanks tumblr for re-teaching me about the first picture above! 

(via olanthanide)

Text

lyndsayfaye:

jacklullaby:

jacklullaby:

unfollower:

men should take advantage of the lack of dress code rules set for guys and wear mini skirts and tank tops to school every day

OH MY GOD  LAST YEAR THE DUDES ON MY CLASS HAVE DONE IT

AND THEY GOT ALL CALLED IN THE PRINCIPAL’S ROOM

BUT THEY DIDNT GOT IN TROUBLE BECAUSE

THEY SAID EXACTLY IT “BUT THOSE RULES ARE ONLY FOR GIRLS”

I’M NOT EVEN JOKING

image

Preach, boys.

Photoset

deputychairman:

seascribe:

Oh gosh, this episode, I have SO MUCH LOVE for this episode. Especially this scene!  Look at Fraser’s horrified librarian face! 

I wouldn’t put actual money on it but I might know this episode off by heart because they released it on VHS (remember VHS? No? Ok then) in the 90s and me and E watched it over and over and over again and it NEVER GOT OLD and is it any wonder neither of us had a boyfriend til we were 20 because what real-life teenage boy could compete with all the post-Victoria hidden angst passive-aggressive (Fraser) traditional bitching aggressive (Ray) All Wet with tuning forks, useful definition of Greek words, Frannie making a scene because “kiss me and I’ll give you a pork chop does not constitute respect” and she’s right, and occasionally, very occasionally, Fraser does feel unappreciated?

Must reblog, because this is one of my all-time favorite episodes too.

(Source: santanaisbitho)

Link

seananmcguire:

onlyalittlelion:

As a professor, may I ask you what you think about fanfiction?

I think fanfiction is literature and literature, for the most part, is fanfiction, and that anyone that dismisses it simply on the grounds…

Tags: Fanfiction
Photo
ghostbees:

I like you as I’ve never liked anyone.

ghostbees:

I like you as I’ve never liked anyone.

Photoset

deputychairman:

missionlameturtle:

Internet, surely by now you know that I prefer my Rays spiky, blonde, and theoretically Polish, but I needed to share these RayV pics with you.

Yes. Yes you did.

I can’t not reblog Ms. Fraser.

Photoset

lookninjas:

rainbowrites:

buffysummrs:

grahamburglar:

andwhentheskywasopened:

aldora89:

fozmeadows:

karnythia:

nickminichino:

karnythia:

nickminichino:

karnythia:

Reporter: So, why do you write these strong female characters?
Joss Whedon:
Because you’re still asking me that question.

The question should be “Why do you write seemingly strong women and then punish them for that strength?” I see a lot of characters in this set who got shit on by Joss not to mention at least one actress he fired for the crime of getting pregnant.

A friend of mine likes to challenge “Joss Whedon, Feminist” acolytes to name a female character on Buffy who doesn’t die or go crazy.

I feel like this game could be expanded to find lead female characters who don’t die, go crazy, or lose a loved one in a gruesome way as part of their suffering. Bonus points if they get to the end without anyone threatening to rape them or trying to rape them. There has to be at least one right?

If we include those, we may as well be playing bingo. Joss Whedon’s female characters’ punishments: collect them all!

Who gets mind wiped? Who gets beaten? Who watches everything she ever loved burn? It’s a game for all ages! Bonus points for the ones who die without ever having gotten to live!

I might have feelings about Kendra. A lot of them.

Goddamit, and now I feel compelled to do an actual tally of his original female characters, albeit offhand and from memory. So:

Buffy the Vampire Slayer

Buffy - two deaths, one rape threat, one attempted rape, two sexual assaults, one dead parent.

Willow - one rape threat, two breaks with sanity, one dead girlfriend.

Cordelia - damselled about a billion times, one attempted forced marriage.

Anya -  one rape threat, dead.

Tara - dead.

Kendra - dead.

Faith - multiple breaks with sanity.

Ms Calender - dead.

Joyce - dead.

Dawn - one attempted forced marriage, one dead parent.

Darla - dead.

Drusilla - multiple breaks with sanity.

[I don’t know enough about angel, I cut this part]

Firefly

Kaylee - one rape threat.

River - multiple breaks with sanity.

Zoe - one dead husband.

Inara - one threat of sexual assault.

[I don’t know enough about doll house, I cut this part]

I should probably leave this hornet’s nest alone.  But I’m pissed off right now, because today I learned people think Joss Whedon is sexist for putting his female characters through the wringer.

As if a fundamental part of the hero’s journey isn’t suffering, having loved ones die, or dying themselves.  As if he doesn’t do that to EVERYONE he writes.  Here are some of his male characters’ trials, in the same form as above (and this is just the stuff I remember off the top of my head):

Giles - one dead lover/dear friend, brutally tortured at least once

Xander - one threat of sexual assault, implied childhood abuse, at least one break with reality (that made him leave Anya at the altar), one dead lover, loses an eye

Spike - sexually assaulted by his mother, attempted forced marriage (the same spell that got Buffy), brutally tortured, at least one break with sanity, one death

Riley - turned into a meat puppet by Frankensoldier Adam

Angel - tortured in hell, at least one death, lots of other stuff I don’t remember because Angel bores me

Wash - brutally tortured, dead

Mal - brutally tortured

Book - dead

And what do I see when I look at the female characters listed above?

Buffy - survives the series with a hopeful heart, comes up with a plan to break an explicitly patriarchal tradition, saves the world a lot, allowed to be flawed and messy and still strong

Willow - survives the series, finds love again after the death of her soulmate, grows from an awkward high school girl to a junkie to the most powerful witch in history

Dawn - survives the series, grows from an annoying little sister to a competent young woman

Faith - survives the series, seemingly a “bad girl” stereotype who actually has depth and a compelling misled-by-evil-(and-love) —> redemption arc

Cordelia - seemingly a “shallow girl” stereotype who actually has depth and comes through when her friends need her despite being out of her element

Anya - a former monster who switches sides, finds and loses love but consciously steps away from deadly coping mechanisms, can run a store better than Giles,  illuminates humanity in compelling ways

Tara - shy and unassuming, wise and compassionate and forgiving. She can’t beat up monsters, but that’s okay, she’s still part of the team.

For fuck’s sake.  It’s supernatural genre television, not tiptoeing through fields of daisies.  People will die.  People will be threatened.  Sometimes it will happen as a plot device.  If you write a lot of female characters (I saw something earlier like the percentage of women in primetime shows is like 17%, which Whedon obviously blows out of the water), a lot of them are going to have horrible things happen to them.

But what Whedon does that’s so different from most is he writes female characters as people.  He doesn’t portray stereotypical femininity and strength as mutually exclusive.  He shows that physical strength isn’t the only “real” strength they can have.  He gives them diverse personalities and shows how they’re all powerful and weak in their own way.  He lets them grow and evolve organically.  He lets them be compelling villains.  He lets them be sympathetic victims.  He lets them be fearless warriors for good.  Sometimes all three.  He lets them make horrible mistakes and successfully atone for them.  He shows them suffering for plot-related reasons, doesn’t shy away from the after-effects (versus, say, Deanna Troi in TNG - so much of the stuff that happened to her was gratuitous) and shows them getting back up.

Also, don’t you dare pretend Joyce’s death can be reduced to part of some anti-feminist pattern (for three separate characters, no less.  And the fact that Buffy even had a parent in the first place is unusual for the hero archetype).  That kind of thing actually happens in the real world, it was handled with incredible sensitivity and realism, and watching Buffy and Dawn go through the grieving process is something many people relate to intensely.  It’s fantastic writing.  It’s good conflict.  It’s good television.

If anyone is writing off Joss’ female characters, it’s you.  It’s the people who act like these characters are little more than a list of tragic and biased casualties, and fuck everything else they accomplish.

^*slow claps it out*

Oh my God.

Thank you. I have been told a million times that Joss is anti-feminist and every time I’ve tried to argue against that but I haven’t been able to do it this magnificently.

This just made me cry. THANK YOU. Suffering is not weakness, but strength is not the inability to stumble nor the absence of weakness. Often times, the greater the weakness, the greater the strength.

Joss Whedon has a lot of issues in his writing, but I really do take offense to looking at the things these characters go through as examples of how anti-feminist he is. As someone said, it’s a fucking supernatural genre. If he wasn’t putting them through hell then there would be no story!

(Reposting because I was torn between using the phrase “go crazy” and “had a break with reality” and, in trying to edit, the whole post went fubar. This is what happens when I get so mad I have to reblog from my phone. Also, this will not be word for word like the original post, because phone.)

(But the gist of my post was this:)

I am not an anti-feminist statement or some kind of weak, trembling victim just because I’m mentally ill. Fridging is indeed bad - reducing a character down to that one time she “broke from reality” is also bad. Hating Whedon is fine. Saying that a character is a terrible role model because “she went crazy” is not fucking fine. I’m glad you stuck it to all those acolytes out there; I know you must be very proud.now, kindly, go fuck yourself.

(Source: hxcfairy, via mountlandme)

Link

irresistible-revolution:

fandom0ftheopera:

I’ve seen Elementary fans claiming their Sherlock is better than Sherlock’s because ours is an asshole and theirs is ‘sympathetic’ and ‘kind’.

I have nothing against Elementary, but may I just remind you - Sherlock is an asshole, because Sherlock is canonically an asshole. He was described as being cold, dispassionate and arrogant - not kind.

oh dear.

From ‘The Adventure of the Three Garridebs’, when Watson is shot: “For the first time, I had a glimpse of a great heart as well as a great brain.”

From ‘The Adventure of the Six Napoleons’, when Lestrade pays Holmes a sincere and heartfelt compliment : “And as he turned away, it seemed he was more nearly moved by the softer human emotions than I had ever seen him.”

From ‘The Problem of Thor Bridge’, when a rich client explains how he tried to seduce his children’s governess: “this young lady was in a sense under your protection…you have tried to ruin a defenseless girl who was under your roof. Some of you rich men have to be taught that all the world cannot be bribed into condoning your offenses.”

From ‘The Adventure of the Veiled Lodger’, after hearing the tragic story of a woman whose face was mauled by a lion; “Then Holmes stretched out his long arm and patted her hand with such a show of sympathy as I had seldom known him to exhibit, ‘Poor girl!’ he said, ‘Poor girl! The ways of fate are indeed hard to understand. If there is not some compensation hereafter, then the world is a cruel jest’ “

From ‘The Adventure of the Speckled Band’, when speaking with a client whose father is physically abusive: “Five little livid spots, the marks of four fingers and a thumb, were printed upon the white wrist. ‘You have been cruelly used,’ said Holmes.”

Also, in “The Adventure of Abbey Grange,” he helps a young man escape, who intervened to prevent an alcoholic aristocrat from beating his wife.

In “The Adventure of the Second Stain”, Holmes goes out of his way to shield Lady Hilda from her husband’s anger, even though the husband was Holmes’ client.

In “The Adventure of the Blue Carbuncle” he lets a pathetic petty criminal go free because he doesn’t think making him a ‘jailbird’ will help.

There are many other instances of Holmes showing kindness, empathy and even breaking the law to help people gain justice.

Other phrases and words Watson uses to describe Holmes at various times:

“quiet, genial.”

“without a harshness, which was foreign to his nature.”

“he had a remarkable gentleness and courtesy in his dealings with women.”

Holmes may have displayed a certain impatience for social affectation, but he maintains a strong moral compass and asserts this fact several times, in various situations, towards various people.

This idea that Holmes is a “sociopathic” asshole is quite a contemporary reading and, might I add, a lazy one that’s as ignorant of mental illness as it is offensive to those of us who’re tired of white men getting to stomp all over people in the name of ‘genius’ and ‘anti-hero’ status. BBC Sherlock’s reading of Holmes is one that’s built on popular cultural tropes, and succeeds because of it. ‘Elementary’ reads Holmes with a fuller attention to the complexities of his character.

Anytime someone says ‘well Holmes is an asshole’ as a conclusive fact, I know that your canon knowledge is either limited or deliberately misinterpreted.

Do some re-reading.

image

Holmes could definitely be an ass in canon (especially to Watson), but he was never as overtly rude and actively cruel as BBC Sherlock can be, and there are plenty of examples of empathy and sympathy for his clients, as well as concern for justice.

(Source: jeancourfeyrac, via sirarthurconandoilies)

Photoset

my-headphon3s:

Me, every single morning

(via thepenultimaterolo)

Link

leikkona:

fuckyeahlesbianliterature:

fucknobiphobia:

When you hear “Sappho” or “Sapphic”, what do you think? Lesbians, right? After all, the word “lesbian” means what it does because Sappho lived on the island of Lesbos. For those who are hazy over who Sappho was, she was an…

Reblogging for the commentary on this, because I am rather uncomfortable with trying to assign modern conceptualizations of sexuality-as-social-identity to people from cultures which didn’t conceptualize things that way. Whoever Sappho was attracted to, she would not have defined herself as gay or bisexual, because the ancient Greeks did not have those terms (though they were clearly familiar with same-sex desire).

Text

Fic!

Some older fic that I’ve posted recently:

The Grading Version of Good Cop, Bad Cop
Fandom: Sherlock (BBC)
Characters: Sherlock, John
Words: 485
Rating: S for Silliness
Summary: “You can’t just fail all of them, Sherlock.”
Notes: In the same vein as On the Benefits of a Classical Education (which is to say, written when I was buried under student papers, and about ready to gnaw off my grading fingers in frustration). Not beta’d or britpicked, because I wrote it purely for my own amusement (or rather, catharsis), and it is really too short and cracky to bother, but if you notice anything feel free to point it out.

It Was a Very Good Year
Fandom: Life on Mars
Characters: Gene Hunt, Sam Tyler
Words: 1,230
Rating: PG
Summary: “You enjoying playing chauffeur for a change, Miss Daisy?”
Notes: Completely ignores the existence of A2A.This existed in my writing folder for ages as ‘Old Sam and Gene Ficlet.’ It’s old in two senses: 1) Sam and Gene are both old in it, and 2) it was one of the very first LoM things I ever wrote. Specifically, it was the third thing, and my earliest real attempt at writing banter between the two of them. I was never quite pleased with it, or always thought the basic plot (such as it is) was too cliché, so I never posted it. There were bits of it I liked that I kept thinking I might use in something else, but since that hasn’t happened and probably won’t, I figure I might as well just post it as-is for the archives.

Lipstick
Fandom: Life on Mars
Characters: Mrs. Hunt (implied Sam/Gene)
Rating: PG
Word Count: 312
Warnings: Adultery
Summary: She would never slander her husband. But perhaps they’d reached a point where he would believe that she might damn him with the truth.
Notes: Years ago, this started life as a Friday Drabble Challenge entry, but it got too long. I couldn’t figure out a way to cut it down, and never bothered posting it as is. Original prompts: “knee, slander, water, egg, lipstick, the missus finds out.”

Intemperance
Fandom: Life on Mars
Characters: Sam/Gene
Rating: PG
Word Count: 500
Warnings: None
Summary: The most surprising thing is that when it happens, they are both completely sober.
Notes: Originally written for the Sober Challenge at 1973flashfic, ages and ages ago. Not posted then because it didn’t feel finished. Today I’ve dusted it off, rearranged it slightly and added a couple of sentences. Represents one of my very few attempts at writing Sam/Gene (probably with good reason).